In one corner, we have an unqualified, unpredictable sexist. In the other, we have a corrupt, scheming career politician.
At least that's what many Americans see when they look at the two current Presidential candidates. (I personally think one of these conclusions has more merit than the other, but for more on that tangent, see this article.) Public confidence in either of the two major party nominees is far lower than it has been in other election years. Many are starting to see this election as little more than a joke, with two equally disastrous options.
They turn to third-party candidates as a way to opt out of this difficult decision – and these candidates should be discussed.
Former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson's policies may appeal to voters, particularly young adults, at first glance. After all, he supports marijuana legalization, the LGBT community and social tolerance, while avoiding big government spending. Sounds alright so far.
Then you take a closer look at Mr. Johnson and realize that other aspects of his policy plan are borderline disastrous. He supports the abolishment of a federal minimum wage, raising the retirement age to 75, and no corporate tax. He admits global warming is real, yet opposes legislative attempts to support renewable energy sources.
On the other hand, we have Dr. Jill Stein, a Harvard graduate with little political experience nominated by the Green Party to the Oval Office. She supports free college, sure, and she is also in favor of the decriminalization of drugs – but her arguably anti-science policy stances should make you reconsider.
Ultimately, while no one should tell you what to do with your vote, please keep these things in mind as you enter your voting location next month. Even if you are aware of the dark side of each of these candidates, and support them anyway, you must know that neither of these candidates will become president. It's theoretically possible, but it absolutely won't be happening anytime soon.
Whether you use your vote as a voice of dissent or dissatisfaction is up to you, but understand the risks and dangers of each of these candidates.
This article is written as a sort of response to Colby's article about how the lesser of two evils may be a third option. He is a writer that I have nothing but respect for – I think we just see this issue differently. Regardless, be sure to check out his point of view; it may coincide more with your beliefs!
