The Solution To Foreign Policy: Smarter Intervention, Not More Intervention | The Odyssey Online
Start writing a post
Politics and Activism

The Solution To Foreign Policy: Smarter Intervention, Not More Intervention

A quick look into foreign policy, past, present and future

30
The Solution To Foreign Policy: Smarter Intervention, Not More Intervention
United States of America

Foreign policy is broken up into two very broad sides: the isolationist side and the interventionist side. For most of our country’s history, we have been isolationist, at least in the respect of directly involving our military in conflicts around the globe. Ever since the Cold War, the United States’ foreign policy could be characterized as interventionist. In order to combat the Soviet Union, we chose to intervene in other countries' affairs so we could spread the ideals of democracy. Our country’s foreign policy goals have not changed that much since the fall of the Soviet Union; we still adhere to a liberal view of spreading democracy to different parts of the world, most recently the Middle East. Neoconservatives, as well as other hawkish liberals, want to use military force to bring democracy to oppressed areas.

While I am all for intervening in countries abroad, it is not the United States’ job to serve as the world’s sole democratizing force. We should not focus on liberalism as our strategy when viewing the world’s problems. I am not arguing for less intervention inherently, I am arguing for smarter, more calculated intervention.

There is a distinct difference between the state of the world now versus during the Cold War. Liberalism was necessary during the Cold War because spreading ideals of democracy helped stop a nuclear war. Things were tense during this time period, and any upper hand that could be gained by either the United States or Soviet Union was necessary. Spreading democracy to different regions in the world often times gave us the upper hand and stopped an aggressive Soviet Union. With that being said, we are no longer fighting a war of ideals. There is no great struggle between communism and democracy. To continue to spread democracy to areas would be to almost return to an early 19th century, Imperial Era mindset.

During the Imperial Era, an argument often used to justify our actions was that we were bringing civilization and democracy to these “less civilized” areas. This belief was summed up in Rudyard Kipling’s “The White Man’s Burden.” While this isn’t explicitly stated as the justification today, it might as well be. Who are we to say that certain ways of life aren’t good enough? It is not our job to bring democracy to everywhere in the world and the idea that we should is arrogant. Realistically, democracy probably is the best form of government for the people, but it should not be forced on countries at gunpoint. We do not have the justification to intervene in a nation unless doing so would protect American interests.

While it sounds like I am writing from an isolationist’s point of view, that is truly not the case. America should have the power to intervene whenever it is in our interest. People always argue that intervention is the problem and that we often destabilize areas and often times they have the right idea. However, it is not intervention itself that destabilizes regions, it is liberalistic intervention that destabilizes regions. The goal should not be to limit our intervention as a nation, rather it should be to intervene in smarter, more responsible ways.

Looking back on the information we have now, most people would say that our nation’s intervention in Iraq was not justified and that it was an overreach of our military. Some have even called it the worst foreign policy mistake in the past couple of decades. Knowing what we do now, the intelligence gathering was not adequate and the report was released too quickly. However, hindsight is 20/20 and our focus should be to the future, not looking to the past. Again, it is not our job to bring democracy to areas and that we should not choose the government; getting rid of Saddam Hussein was not our job. However, that wasn’t even our biggest flaw with our policy approach. Our policy that eliminated the Ba’ath party was a complete overstretch and is what caused all of the insurgency that keeps us in Iraq until today. It was not our job to topple the dictator in Iraq, but it was even less of our job to eliminate Iraq’s leading political party and also the arm of their military. Our focus should have been on intelligence gathering instead of a strong willed policy involving military force.

Similarly, it is not our job to bring an end to an authoritarian regime in Syria. Many argue that there will not be stability in the region in the area until Assad is replaced and ISIL is destroyed. I would venture to say that there will never be peace in the Levant, and it is not our duty to ensure a false sense of peace. However, it is true that ISIL is a serious existential threat to American Security. We should intervene in the Middle East only to eliminate ISIL. That intervention should entail the strategic use of a moderate number of special operations forces to root out ISIL fighters and the full wrath of our Air Force’s superior firepower. Eliminating ISIL would not take long, and would not prove to be extremely challenging. A policy that focuses on containment to slowly choke out this terrorist group is not effective because they are not a true state and can operate in strained situations. Eliminating ISIL should be our military’s first focus as of now.

Only when there is a threat to our national interests and security should the United States intervene. This isn’t necessarily limiting the amount of intervention our country is involved with, because there are multiple threats to our interest. However, in the grand scheme of things smarter invention would ultimately limit the need for our intervention. Using smarter intervention, we would have been able to leave Iraq and Afghanistan after a few years in each country. There should have been absolutely no need to continue fighting in the region this long. If we focus more on threats to our interest in a laser-like way we would not only be safer as a nation, but not be seen as overreaching our authority as a nation. We can maintain our position of the strong leader of military affairs and foreign policy while intervening smarter.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Featured

15 Mind-Bending Riddles

Hopefully they will make you laugh.

180875
 Ilistrated image of the planet and images of questions
StableDiffusion

I've been super busy lately with school work, studying, etc. Besides the fact that I do nothing but AP chemistry and AP economics, I constantly think of stupid questions that are almost impossible to answer. So, maybe you could answer them for me, and if not then we can both wonder what the answers to these 15 questions could be.

Keep Reading...Show less
Entertainment

Most Epic Aurora Borealis Photos: October 2024

As if May wasn't enough, a truly spectacular Northern Lights show lit up the sky on Oct. 10, 2024

7821
stunning aurora borealis display over a forest of trees and lake
StableDiffusion

From sea to shining sea, the United States was uniquely positioned for an incredible Aurora Borealis display on Thursday, Oct. 10, 2024, going into Friday, Oct. 11.

It was the second time this year after an historic geomagnetic storm in May 2024. Those Northern Lights were visible in Europe and North America, just like this latest rendition.

Keep Reading...Show less
 silhouette of a woman on the beach at sunrise
StableDiffusion

Content warning: This article contains descriptions of suicide/suicidal thoughts.

When you are feeling down, please know that there are many reasons to keep living.

Keep Reading...Show less
Relationships

Power of Love Letters

I don't think I say it enough...

452916
Illistrated image of a letter with 2 red hearts
StableDiffusion

To My Loving Boyfriend,

  • Thank you for all that you do for me
  • Thank you for working through disagreements with me
  • Thank you for always supporting me
  • I appreciate you more than words can express
  • You have helped me grow and become a better person
  • I can't wait to see where life takes us next
  • I promise to cherish every moment with you
  • Thank you for being my best friend and confidante
  • I love you and everything you do

To start off, here's something I don't say nearly enough: thank you. Thank you, thank you, thank you from the bottom of my heart. You do so much for me that I can't even put into words how much I appreciate everything you do - and have done - for me over the course of our relationship so far. While every couple has their fair share of tiffs and disagreements, thank you for getting through all of them with me and making us a better couple at the other end. With any argument, we don't just throw in the towel and say we're done, but we work towards a solution that puts us in a greater place each day. Thank you for always working with me and never giving up on us.

Keep Reading...Show less
Lifestyle

11 Signs You Grew Up In Hauppauge, NY

Because no one ever really leaves.

23548
Map of Hauppauge, New York
Google

Ah, yes, good old Hauppauge. We are that town in the dead center of Long Island that barely anyone knows how to pronounce unless they're from the town itself or live in a nearby area. Hauppauge is home to people of all kinds. We always have new families joining the community but honestly, the majority of the town is filled with people who never leave (high school alumni) and elders who have raised their kids here. Around the town, there are some just some landmarks and places that only the people of Hauppauge will ever understand the importance or even the annoyance of.

Keep Reading...Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments