When you think about writing a material full of sense you have to pay attention to the way in which sense is perceived by the readers and their perspectives. It’s hard to create a material which is more or less engageable while trying to remain true to yourself in a system of though insignificant to others.
Therefore, the readers should have two things in mind. First, the elaborate systems in which a though provoking materials are assimilated must be manufactured in a unique and realistic ways. Second, the engaged audiences should be able to feel the interpretation freedom which allows them to think in a realm of though dissimilar to the one provided by the meaning producer.
The thing it itself is extremely disputable and meaning could crush under the pressure of loss of relevance and credibility. Therefore meaning serves as a guideline for the interpretor of sense, where the actual goal of the meaning creator remains hidden and faded in the noise of information tending to blur the line between the subjective and the objective.
The axis around which the meaning circulates is made by the ambiguous words trying to create sense of the knowledge source, while completely hiding the depth of the creator’s thought reservoir. In a way, this could imply that the knowledge bases obtained from the information processing are almost completely manufactured by the imagination of the subject receiving the meaning, instead of the source providing complex net meant to be learned.
Even this article itself is your own interpretation of the words created by my realm of thought, where the real purpose of the article remains lost in the ocean of information surrounding it. The symbols incorporated in every word written in this work are only echoing in your mind while I, as a creator of the meaning (but not the words themselves), remain hidden behind the veil of intolerance between our attempts to interpret the objective knowledge, which in itself is a lie created by our inability to overcome the fear of the unknown.
