Chief Justice Who Doesn't Believe In Judicial Review | The Odyssey Online
Start writing a post
Politics and Activism

Chief Justice Who Doesn't Believe In Judicial Review

Constitution>Public Good?

46
Chief Justice Who Doesn't Believe In Judicial Review
Lauren Petracca | MLive.com

Chief Justice of the Michigan State Supreme Court, Robert P. Young, came to Albion College on April 14th to give a lecture titled "A Judicial Traditionalist Confronts Justice Brennan's School of Judicial Philosophy." He came dressed in a suit and bowtie. The attendees ranged in age from 18-80, and almost all were dressed business professional. I wore my Assassin’s Creed hoodie made by a friend, beat-up work shoes, and the same jeans I had worn that morning to pottery class, spattered with dried clay.

Young was here to discuss a very interesting debate in the Judiciary, that of Constitutional Traditionlism or Originalism vs. Interpretivism. Well, I find it interesting, anyway. It is the kind of blindingly technical, seemingly esoteric subject matter that I immensely enjoy poring over and testing various perspectives on, testing my formulation of ethics and philosophy and political opinion. Others may find themselves asleep halfway through Young’s introduction.

The CliffNotes version: The original powers delegated to the judiciary in the Constitution are incredibly limited, and did not include the power of Judicial Review, where the courts examine laws passed by the legislature and determine whether or not they are consistent with the Constitution and precedent-setting rulings by past courts. A hardcore Originalist or Traditionalist like Young does not believe that courts ought to exercise this power, though he especially objects to Interpretivists (or Rorschachians, as Young calls them) who apply their modern sense of ethics and modern understanding of what derived version of constitutional rights are most appropriate for a modern society. In Young’s opinion, it is only through the process of Constitutional Amendment that the interpretation of the Constitution can be or ought to be changed from its Original 1790 meaning. The action by modern judges to interpret the Constitution towards their understanding of social good is, in Young’s view, a bad thing that promotes undemocratic and unconstitutional rule of the many by a class of educated Philosopher Kings, in the form of justices.

“I submit that the Rorschachian school embraces the notion of a judicial oligarchy; the rule of the many by the few.”

I find this position to be practically and morally unworkable. Justice Young makes excellent points towards the dangers of an oligarchic judiciary that infringes on “the rights of a state to make its own laws,” but I side with Alexander Hamilton in that the Judiciary remains the weakest of the three branches of government as it has neither “Force nor will, but merely judgment.” The courts may strike down a law they see as unfair, but they cannot prescribe their own laws. I said to Justice Young in the Q&A session afterward that power of judicial review is crucial to the protection of civilians. Young gave the example of a New York City set of laws which made dancing in bars illegal. Young argued that a patron who was charged with a fine for such an infraction is not, in the Originalist perspective, in his rights to challenge his sentence on the basis that the law is unjust. In Young's opinion, the only just way for someone to change a law is through the legislative process, by voting or running for office and changing it themselves. A state could pass a law, for instance, which punishes the act of dancing in a bar with the sentence of death. I posed this hypothetical to Justice Young, and asked what a couple sentenced to death for dancing in a bar could do to prevent this clearly unjust outcome from occurring.
"They could vote," He said.

Without judicial review, someone given this sentence would have no recourse to say “this law is unfair on constitutional grounds, and I ought not be punished,” they would have to simply be killed. I recognize the danger in the law being more oligarchically controlled by bodies like the judiciary, but I think the danger of an incompetent legislature put into power by an incompetent electorate and making incompetent laws which cause real harm to people is much higher than the danger of an overzealous judiciary striking down every law they don’t like.

Young may have a good point in the fact that the Constitution does not originally give this much power of interpretation to the judiciary, but in my view, society is better off with this version of government than it would have been with the Originalist perspective.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Featured

15 Mind-Bending Riddles

Hopefully they will make you laugh.

183093
 Ilistrated image of the planet and images of questions
StableDiffusion

I've been super busy lately with school work, studying, etc. Besides the fact that I do nothing but AP chemistry and AP economics, I constantly think of stupid questions that are almost impossible to answer. So, maybe you could answer them for me, and if not then we can both wonder what the answers to these 15 questions could be.

Keep Reading...Show less
Entertainment

Most Epic Aurora Borealis Photos: October 2024

As if May wasn't enough, a truly spectacular Northern Lights show lit up the sky on Oct. 10, 2024

9747
stunning aurora borealis display over a forest of trees and lake
StableDiffusion

From sea to shining sea, the United States was uniquely positioned for an incredible Aurora Borealis display on Thursday, Oct. 10, 2024, going into Friday, Oct. 11.

It was the second time this year after an historic geomagnetic storm in May 2024. Those Northern Lights were visible in Europe and North America, just like this latest rendition.

Keep Reading...Show less
 silhouette of a woman on the beach at sunrise
StableDiffusion

Content warning: This article contains descriptions of suicide/suicidal thoughts.

When you are feeling down, please know that there are many reasons to keep living.

Keep Reading...Show less
Relationships

Power of Love Letters

I don't think I say it enough...

454225
Illistrated image of a letter with 2 red hearts
StableDiffusion

To My Loving Boyfriend,

  • Thank you for all that you do for me
  • Thank you for working through disagreements with me
  • Thank you for always supporting me
  • I appreciate you more than words can express
  • You have helped me grow and become a better person
  • I can't wait to see where life takes us next
  • I promise to cherish every moment with you
  • Thank you for being my best friend and confidante
  • I love you and everything you do

To start off, here's something I don't say nearly enough: thank you. Thank you, thank you, thank you from the bottom of my heart. You do so much for me that I can't even put into words how much I appreciate everything you do - and have done - for me over the course of our relationship so far. While every couple has their fair share of tiffs and disagreements, thank you for getting through all of them with me and making us a better couple at the other end. With any argument, we don't just throw in the towel and say we're done, but we work towards a solution that puts us in a greater place each day. Thank you for always working with me and never giving up on us.

Keep Reading...Show less
Lifestyle

11 Signs You Grew Up In Hauppauge, NY

Because no one ever really leaves.

24328
Map of Hauppauge, New York
Google

Ah, yes, good old Hauppauge. We are that town in the dead center of Long Island that barely anyone knows how to pronounce unless they're from the town itself or live in a nearby area. Hauppauge is home to people of all kinds. We always have new families joining the community but honestly, the majority of the town is filled with people who never leave (high school alumni) and elders who have raised their kids here. Around the town, there are some just some landmarks and places that only the people of Hauppauge will ever understand the importance or even the annoyance of.

Keep Reading...Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments