Nature Vs. Nurture | The Odyssey Online
Start writing a post
Student Life

Nature Vs. Nurture

Does a person's genetics or environment have a greater impact on their personality development? The answer may be more complex than black and white.

7175
Nature Vs. Nurture
Famous Biographies

The debate of whether nature or nurture influences childhood development has been a quintessential aspect of developmental psychology for centuries. Developmental psychologists have been trying to understand if children are born with inherited personality features, or if they adopt these features throughout their lifetime.

After studying multiple topics of human development and behavior, I have come to the conclusion that both nature and nurture are responsible for shaping a person’s personality, but nurture has more prevalence over nature.

Although the development of physical features such as one’s facial structure, body weight/height, and hair color are pre-embedded their DNA, mental features such as one’s thought processes, moral and ethical positions, and construction of their psyche are all products of their environment and outside catalysts.


From Ivan Pavlov to Philip Zimbardo, social scientists have manipulated the idea of nature vs. nurture, applying it to various labs and tests in order to strengthen their argument. One of the most formidable psychologists to participate in the study of nature vs. nurture is none other than Austrian psychoanalyst, Sigmund Freud.

Freud took great interest in the mind and how the development of the mind shaped a child’s personality. Freud believed in three main parts of the mind; the conscious mind, the preconscious mind, and the unconscious mind.

Underneath the layers of the mind, Freud believed there lived a person’s “psyche”. The psyche consists of three parts as well, closely related to the parts of the mind: the superego, the ego, and the id.

The id is the primary stage of personality development, hence the nickname “the inner child”. However, the id is a primitive part of the mind; it is instinctual and unsympathetic.

At ages 1-3, the second part of the psyche is formed: the ego. The ego mediates and protects the id from irrational decision making, helping kids learn right from wrong.

At ages 3-5, the last part of the psyche is formed, the superego. The superego is the internal parent, responsible for chastising the ego for failing to suppress the id.

Freud believed that throughout a person’s life, the id would grow weaker and weaker, while the ego and superego grew stronger. In the case of nature vs. nurture, nurture takes the victory here.

Sigmund Freud thought of the parent as a child’s first form of environmental influence in its lifetime. In his book, An Outline of Psychoanalysis (1940), Freud discussed the importance of a parent’s role in their child’s life.

He believed that the ways that a child conditioned their child in its youth are the same way it would grow as an adult (Freud, 1899). However, he also believed that the impression parents had on their children fades away over time, leaving it up to the child to find new ways of conditioning.

In an ideal world, a child should experience various forms of situation and consequence in their lifetime, helping them develop their ego as they learn right from wrong. Learning is a skill that is based on the acquisition of new knowledge or in other words, knowledge that is not inherited.

The tools that one needs in order to transcend immaturity and childhood is all dependent on the pieces of knowledge they pick up during growth. In Freud’s eyes, John Doe could have been a bed-wetting, tantrum-throwing, spoiled brat as a child due to his parent’s faults, but has all the potential to grow up to into a poised, erudite, example of a man. It is all about his nurturing in this case.

Freud’s idea of acquiring new knowledge as life progresses is an idea of social science even before his time. Psychologists Max Wertheimer, Kurt Koffka, and Wolfgang Köhler are all credited to the theory of Gestalt psychology, or “whole” psychology.

The main basis of Gestalt psychology is that “all of the [individual] events in a human’s life are related to one another” (OERu Psychology). Gestalt psychologists believe that experiences cannot be broken down into parts, and the culmination of these experiences are what shapes a human personality.

For instance, think of a soldier after a war. There have been many cases where soldiers return back from war with post-traumatic stress disorders and cases of extreme hysteria. After months of hearing firearms echoing, grenades exploding, and blood splattering everywhere in plain sight, these individual events begin to submerge into one gruesome scene of war, endlessly replaying in their mind.

As these events purloin the minds of soldiers, they can begin to show a range of different emotions, from reclusiveness and standoffishness to hostility and sheer insanity. Since psychological evaluations are required before one is drafted into war, it is no secret that these wars are in fact the catalyst for such traumatic change in one’s personality.

A soldier that could have been born completely healthy could grow up to be mentally ill after months on the battlefield, proving nurture’s prevalence over nature. The way that an environment of chaos and pandemonium can impact a person’s personality is the same way that an environment of faulty parents can impact a child’s personality (in the case of Sigmund Freud).

Wertheimer, Koffka, and Köhler all helped proved that experiences are ultimately what shape personality, regardless of the way a person was brought into the world.

From parental interaction to personal life experiences, nurture has proven itself to be the more dominant counterpart in the discussion of nature vs. nurture. It is easy to prove that two people are inevitably bound to grow up differently and express different personalities when the world is filled with such a diverse amount of races, ethnicities, and religions.

However, what happens when two people of the same family, same gender, same race, and same DNA are compared? An advocate for nature would be a hypocrite if they disagreed that these two people would share the exact same personality traits… but they do.

Recent studies in epigenetics proved to scientists that identical twins that share that same DNA are capable of having two completely different sexual orientations. The University of California has prepared a twin studies case for the American Society of Human Genetics in Baltimore.

In this study, it was discovered that it was possible to tell whether a man was homosexual or heterosexual by monitoring tiny changes in how his DNA functions after birth (The Telegraph). The performers of this experiment found that epigenetic changes are known to be triggered by environmental factors such as chemical exposure, childhood abuse, diet, exercise, and stress.

Out of the 37 twins that were involved in the study, there were only 10 pairs in which both twins were homosexual. Since sexual orientation is a major part of personality, this study ultimately showed that nature has no final determination of personality. The environmental factors that influenced the twin’s sexual orientation are all due to nurture, proving its relevance in development.

It is a menial effort for one to prove that both nature and nurture play a role in determining a human’s personality. However, deciphering which one trumps the other is another task.

By studying the parental influence on their offspring at impressionable ages, lifetime experiences affecting a person’s entire psyche, and sexual orientation differentiation in identical twins, nurture has proven to reign dominant over nature in the case of personality determination.

Nurture is the key function of human development, verifying that interpersonal, environmental, and genealogical influences all contribute to shaping one’s personality.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Adulting

18 Things I Want To Do Now That I'm 18

I'm technically an adult, so I'm legally required to live a little, right?

503
Happy Birthday Cake

For the entirety of my high school career, I was always seen as the goody-two-shoes. I never got in trouble with a teacher, I kept stellar grades, and when I wasn't doing extracurricular activities, I was at home studying. Even when I did go out, it was usually with a bunch of fellow band geeks. The night would end before 11:00 PM and the only controversial activity would be a fight based on who unfairly won a round of Apples-to-Apples when someone else clearly had a better card (I promise I'm not still holding a grudge).

Now that I'm officially an adult, I want to pursue some new things. I want to experience life in a way that I never allowed myself to do prior to entering college. These are the years that I'm supposed to embark on a journey of self-discovery, so what better way to do that than to create a bucket list?

Keep Reading...Show less
Featured

10 Life Lessons from Christmas Classics

The holiday classics that shaped my life

313
10 Life Lessons from Christmas Classics
Flickr

The holiday season is full of stress, debt, and forced conversation. While we rush through the month of December, it's important to take a step back and enjoy the moments before they're gone. Most families love to watch Christmas movies, but these beloved films provide more than entertainment. Here are 10 life lessons that I've learned from the holiday classics we watch every year.

Keep Reading...Show less
Featured

15 Mind-Bending Riddles

Hopefully they will make you laugh.

199259
 Ilistrated image of the planet and images of questions
StableDiffusion

I've been super busy lately with school work, studying, etc. Besides the fact that I do nothing but AP chemistry and AP economics, I constantly think of stupid questions that are almost impossible to answer. So, maybe you could answer them for me, and if not then we can both wonder what the answers to these 15 questions could be.

Keep Reading...Show less
Entertainment

Most Epic Aurora Borealis Photos: October 2024

As if May wasn't enough, a truly spectacular Northern Lights show lit up the sky on Oct. 10, 2024

20306
stunning aurora borealis display over a forest of trees and lake
StableDiffusion

From sea to shining sea, the United States was uniquely positioned for an incredible Aurora Borealis display on Thursday, Oct. 10, 2024, going into Friday, Oct. 11.

It was the second time this year after an historic geomagnetic storm in May 2024. Those Northern Lights were visible in Europe and North America, just like this latest rendition.

Keep Reading...Show less
 silhouette of a woman on the beach at sunrise
StableDiffusion

Content warning: This article contains descriptions of suicide/suicidal thoughts.

When you are feeling down, please know that there are many reasons to keep living.

Keep Reading...Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments