Should Political Candidates Be Given The Right To Privacy | The Odyssey Online
Start writing a post
Politics

In A Democracy, The Public’s Right To Know Ought To Be Valued Above The Right To Privacy For Candidates

As citizens, we need to have adequate information in order to make an informed voting decision.

1056
In A Democracy, The Public’s Right To Know Ought To Be Valued Above The Right To Privacy For Candidates

At the heart of the resolution, the public's right to know needs be valued above the right to privacy for candidates. Ultimately, the matter boils down to the right to vote for the public. Citizens in a democracy need to have an adequate amount of information in order to make an informed decision on who they want to vote for. Supporters of a "right to know" typically contend that informed voting decisions are crucial to the democratic process and political participation on a variety of fronts.

For instance, many contend that they have the "right to know" information about who has contributed to a political campaign. Following the 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionCitizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) Supreme Court ruling, political action committees (PACs) and super political action committees (Super PACS) have substantially greater ability to donate to candidates. Supporters of the "right to know" argue that knowing contribution information helps keep politicians accountable, prevents them from being "bought out" by corporations, and allows them to be punished by voters if they accept unethical campaign contributions while running for office.

In addition, super PAC's can accept unlimited contributions but only need donor information quarterly or semi-annually, depending on the election year at hand. Thus, the identity of many wealthy donors remains anonymous until months after the contributions were made. At the end of the day, the sole concern of the government should be to increase its political legitimacy. In order to maximize this, if donors are forced to not reveal their identities to political candidates, then monetary influence will be avoided. The tendency of candidates is to favor wealthy donors, thus forcing them to change their image based on what the donor wants. To avoid this, super PAC's and other large donor's identities should remain anonymous to political candidates at hand.

Other arguments used by those in the "right to know" camp contend that it is important to know details about a candidate's personal life, particularly if they have histories of inappropriate or unethical behavior.

Instances of candidates' misbehavior in the past may influence the public's voting decisions solely because a candidate's actions can determine their overall character and morals.

The allegation at hand however, must reveal a substantial character defect that is relevant to the job. For example, in the Brett Kavanaugh case, the element of prior sexual misconduct revealed a clear flaw in his character. The public was hasty to have a man in office that was accused of a matter like this, and rightfully so. This #MeToo movement created a flurry of resignations around the country that caused a round of special elections — however, new candidates were still reluctant to put sexual abuse front and center in their campaigns.

Tax records can also reveal possible conflicts of interests within candidates. Beginning with Richard Nixon in 1952, most presidential and vice-presidential candidates have released at least some of their tax returns. Since the 1970s, the practice has become standard. Hillary Clinton released the last eight years of her tax records promptly, and other candidates did as well. Tax returns can help paint a clearer picture of a candidate's financial affairs, such as their yearly income, how much the candidate payed in taxes, real estate taxes, and to whom the candidate owes money.

This makes disclosure of income tax returns especially important in order to shed light on possible areas of conflict. Tax returns reveal a substantial portion of the character of the candidate. Information like their debts, businesses, and businesses can help the public understand the state of those affairs and the candidate's overall responsibility related to finances.

Candidates have a moral obligation to disclose to the public in order to reduce political corruption, allow voters to elect prepared candidates, and hold themselves accountable for their personal behavior in order to allow the public to make an informed voting decision. The requirement is accountability. Citizens should be able to hold public officials accountable for their decisions and policies, and therefore, citizens must have information that would enable them to judge how well officials are doing or are likely to do their job.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Lifestyle

11 Confessions Of A Sleep-A-Holic

If your plans get cancelled, there is a 99.9% percent chance you are sleeping.

1001
woman lying on bed
Photo by Kinga Howard on Unsplash

1. What are some of your hobbies? Does sleep count?

I'm so good at sleeping I can do it with my eyes closed

Keep Reading...Show less
one tree hill
Wikipedia Commons

If you need a new series to watch, I recommend One Tree Hill. I watched this series three times now and it only keeps getting better. If you need any more reasons beside the fact that all of the seasons are on Netflix for your binge-watching pleasure, here are seven more reasons to watch it.

Keep Reading...Show less
University of Mount Olive
University of Mount Olive

College is the most exciting time of a person's life. It really is. Exciting is not always a positive feeling though. Excited is a feeling that can be associated with nervousness, anxiety and more. Here are some real tips for college freshman that go beyond the typical, "Go to class," lecture.

Keep Reading...Show less
Relationships

The 5 Pros and Cons Of Long Distance Friendships

Being friends with someone thousands of miles away has its drawbacks and perks.

1616
friends on the beach

True friendship is incredibly rare, and to find a friend that will be there for you through all of life's curveballs is something quite unique. To add distance into the equation, maintaining a real, true friendship can be a struggle. There are good and bad parts that come with long distance friendship.

Keep Reading...Show less
high school girls
Tori Horne

Friendship. It's defined as the state of being attached to another person by feelings of affection or personal regard, but what really is friendship? Is it that occasional hallway talk with that one person who always manages to cheer you up? Is it that relationship you have with someone where they can be gone for a long period of time, but when they come back, it's like they never left? Is it spending every waking hour with someone, and knowing every detail about their life? Is it the relationship that's filled with fighting, but filled with even more resolution? I've learned that it's all of these things, and every friendship is different. It's a beautifully dysfunctional mess that should always be cherished and never be taken for granted.

Keep Reading...Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments