Today, I would like to address the longstanding debate of Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers or Layne's Chicken Fingers. Nearly every A&M student has a strong opinion on this. I would like to take a step back and think of this logically. The most sensible method I can devise would be a pros and cons list. Of course, these pros and cons appear as my personal opinion or review of both restaurants, so take it with a grain of salt. Even though I would expect both of these high-class dining establishments use far more than a single grain of salt per chicken tender.
Canes: The classic, beloved chain is named after, none other than, the owner's dog.
Pros:
1. Familiar!
2. Popular.
3. Better chicken texture. Breading is preferred.
4. Actually Famous.
5. Restaurant atmosphere more pleasant (comparing the two locations on Texas)
6. Better presentation overall.
7. Open until 12 am.
Cons:
1. I find it inappropriate that hushpuppies aren't sold here, given that the restaurant named after a dog.
2. I prefer the peppery sauce of Layne's.
3. Since 1996. A two year lag on the strikingly similar Layne's. Denotes possibility of a copycat!
4. Slightly more expensive. A bit pricey in my opinion for fried chicken and potatoes.
Layne's: The College Station version of Cane's.
Pros:
1. Open since 1994. A two year lead on the largely expanded aforementioned chain.
2. Delicious peppery sauce.
3. Not quite as expensive.
4. In my experience, more generous with fries. More likely to receive extra tenders as well.
Cons:
1. "Almost Famous".
2. Only 4 locations so far.
3. Not as luxurious of an atmosphere inside of the restaurant. (Strictly comparing the 2 locations on Texas)
4. Only open til 11:30 pm.
Similarities:
1. Same basic product. Very little variation.
2. Websites are strikingly similar.
3. Both have a drive-thru.
4. The fries and toast are nearly indistinguishable.
5. Nobody eats the coleslaw/potato salad whatever that stuff is at either establishment. If you do eat it, quite frankly, you don't even deserve a comparison review because you're nasty.
Conclusion:
I never promised to settle this highly-debated, academic argument, only to address it. As with most similar matters of extreme importance, others' opinions should be taken into consideration before discussion with sensitivity. Remember to try both eateries before choosing a side. Could I easily and cost-effectively prepare this meal at home for myself and friends? Yes. Is it worth the effort? No. Cost-benefit analysis, people. Now, go gorge yourself. You deserve it.
